<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zero PR means zero Opps at Pay Per Post &#8211; deal with it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.culturedviews.com/zero-pr-means-zero-opps-at-pay-per-post-deal-with-it/2008/03/09/view.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.culturedviews.com/zero-pr-means-zero-opps-at-pay-per-post-deal-with-it/2008/03/09/view.htm</link>
	<description>News, views and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:04:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.culturedviews.com/zero-pr-means-zero-opps-at-pay-per-post-deal-with-it/2008/03/09/view.htm/comment-page-1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturedviews.com/zero-pr-means-zero-opps-at-pay-per-post-deal-with-it/2008/03/09/view.htm#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Good point Malin. Looking at the PPP high earners today the highest earner yesterday, counting per day, earned $76...and yet there were several Opps that day that were $50 and over...two were $125 worth, several over $35,  BUT, requiring a PR5/7 at least to do them. I just wonder who is left at PPP with such a high PR in order to qualify for them?

I too indeed wonder how on earth one manages to retain such a high PR at PPP in order to be a &#039;high earner&#039; when us lower morsels have been so hard hit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Malin. Looking at the PPP high earners today the highest earner yesterday, counting per day, earned $76&#8230;and yet there were several Opps that day that were $50 and over&#8230;two were $125 worth, several over $35,  BUT, requiring a PR5/7 at least to do them. I just wonder who is left at PPP with such a high PR in order to qualify for them?</p>
<p>I too indeed wonder how on earth one manages to retain such a high PR at PPP in order to be a &#8216;high earner&#8217; when us lower morsels have been so hard hit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malin</title>
		<link>http://www.culturedviews.com/zero-pr-means-zero-opps-at-pay-per-post-deal-with-it/2008/03/09/view.htm/comment-page-1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Malin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturedviews.com/zero-pr-means-zero-opps-at-pay-per-post-deal-with-it/2008/03/09/view.htm#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I would like do know that as well. Since they have so many paid post some of them must have been slapped pretty hard!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like do know that as well. Since they have so many paid post some of them must have been slapped pretty hard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
