Has there ever been a more over-exposed toddler in the world? the kid is even being declared a ‘fashion icon’ !
Now don’t get me wrong – she’s a beautiful little girl and the image of her Mummy - but what strikes me as strange is how vastly different is Tom Cruise’s attitude to this child as opposed to his two adopted kids at that young age.
How many pictures are there of Conor and ‘Bella at the age of two…? just try googling images of either child as babies and all you get are photos of Suri.
Tom and Nicole, back then, were hyper about concealing their two children from the paps and the media – only in recent years are we starting to see what they look like (and ‘Bella ain’t the girliest-looking of teenage girls I have to admit…)
They took them through airports via all the back doors with rugs over the kids heads – while Suri’s little ‘mug’ is all over the front pages! even Nicole is now uncovering her five month old baby girl, Sunday Rose, more often these days in front of photographers.
So why were such lengths taken by Cruise and Kidman to keep Conor and ‘Bella from view while their new (biological) children are front and centre stage…ALL the time!
Some clause perhaps in the original ‘purchase contract’ maybe…?
Whatever Cruise’s concerns were for Conor and ‘Bella’s privacy back then, he certainly does not hold the same for Suri.
Interesting.
Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.Related posts:

And what people had to say…