I always thought that Paul Keating won hands down for being the most arrogant Prime Minister in Australian history, but that was until my fellow countrymen recently elected Kevin Rudd into office. I doubt a more odious, unpleasant and self-serving politician ever existed in my homeland. If you can actually track down PM Rudd in his own country then good luck to you because this hypocrite has clocked up more airmiles in his first couple of years in office conducting his campaign of international grandstanding than he has spent on Australian soil. ’747 Rudd’ they call him now and as he flies around the world posturing in front of his ‘Kyoto’ pals and harping on about carbon emissions, he seems to ignore the sizeable carbon footprint he is clocking up himself. In fact, I would like to see one big carbon footprint placed right on his sanctimonious backside…
PM Rudd is very eager to make his mark as a leader on the world stage and is willing to achieve this at the expense of his own people, those who misguidedly voted for him in the first place. As the 60th refugee boat for 2009 containing the dregs of southeast asia makes it’s way towards Australia he will no doubt be preparing to welcome these individuals with open arms, benefits forms, jobs and free housing. While home repossessions and homelessness is at an all time high among battling Australian’s, Crudd is handing out drinks and appetisers to these unwelcome party-crashers. While his own countrymen are languishing in uncertainty the only people who have any assurity of a future there at all are those who jump in a leaky boat and demand entry.
PM Crudd’s bad tempered arrogance is now being displayed in all it’s glory. If you recall a wonderful Australian film from the 90′s called ‘The Castle’ you will know the story of the Aussie battler Daryl Kerrigan. With the help of small town solicitor Daryl staged a protest and took to court a huge billion-dollar corporation who wanted to reclaim the land his small home stood on to extend an airport. No Govt official or dept would help him save his home so he took them to court…and eventually won on the grounds of a piece of legislation in the Australian Constitution known as ‘without due cause’. But can such a story happen in real life…?

As we speak Peter Spencer, a Western Australia farmer, is into his 37th day of a hunger strike tied to a wind tower (above) in protest at Crudd’s agreement to ‘lock up’ vast tracts of farming land in Australia in order to satsify his Kyoto-mates. Peter Spencer’s farming land has been declared a ‘carbon sink’ and he has been effectively banned from clearing it to use for his livelihood. He has received NO COMPENSATION AT ALL and has been told he will not receive any in the future. That this Govt will confiscate viable privately owned agricultural land without any due compensation to the owners is nothing short of criminal. It is unAustralian, it is THEFT. Mr Spencer has claimed he will remain exactly where he is until the Prime Minister agrees to speak with him on the issue.

What Mr Spencer needs is some native Australians to claim landrights on the land – in that case the consultations and committees will go into overdrive and the cash payments will be huge. Mr Spencer cannot even get this to be heard in the courts – his land has been effectively stolen. But why should he have to go to court? the Australian Constitution states that the Government MUST compensate him for his stolen land. The Government is acting OUTSIDE of the Australian Constitution and therefore is a DE-FACTO Government and a Foreign power. Any Courts Peter takes this to will also be a de-facto court and NOT a part of Australia, relying purely upon civil law (the law of contract) instead of Common Law and Trial by Jury. The government and the courts are there to serve big businesses, banks and corporations, NOT the Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia which is the People.
This Kyoto-idiocy now dictates that Australians cannot clear their own land for development or even safety from bushfires – and the Australian Govt has now embarked on a policy of locking up land while refusing to pay compensation to the owners. Crudd will not meet with Mr Spencer and this is understandable; if it were a boat load of asylum seekers threatening to jump overboard he would be there in a second ensuring those at the UN were taking full notice of what a big man he is - but to help an ordinary Australian farmer simply get a fair deal…?
There’s no publicity in that is there mate…
Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.
And what people had to say…