Daily Archives: June 16, 2009

The Times ousts NightJack and kills the blogger’s right to anonymity

nightjackI never had the chance to read the excellent blog written by NightJack - An English Detective and I am really kicking myself because this award winning site has been removed from the internet. Why…? he was forced into deleting his content by the courts and the threat of charges. He was forced to reveal his identity. (Though do some searching and his posts will be archived or cached somewhere online).

NightJack is a policeman who wrote about law, policing, issues in society that we are all interested in. Because of his profession he chose – as was his right – to blog anonymously. Unfortunately freedom of expression is not extended to the individual in British society as much as we would like to believe, and fear of recriminations from authorities sometimes force an individual to ‘hide’ who he/she is.

The Times went to court to win the right to publish NightJack’s real name – Richard Horton – after one journalist decided that NightJack just might be getting more readership than his newspaper employer…(my opinion there of course). NightJack’s blog was incredibly successful, award winning (the Orwell Award no less) and honest.

Maybe newspapers are feeling threatened by ‘the blogger’ – maybe we are proving to be too much competition for sites like TimesOnline. We can write what your typical hack is too restricted by political correctness to even dare suggest. I write this blog as forthright and honestly as possible – all opinions are my own and I choose not to be anonymous, my name is freely seen here on the pages. If NightJack wanted a nom-de-plume, as many newspaper columnists retain the right to have, then why not the blogger…?

The Independent published a recent article about him – Online and Under Cover - and respected his right to keep his identity secret – so what the hell is it with The Times? politicians can choose anonymity, criminals like Tracey Connolly and Stephen Barker can be awarded the privilege of anonymity – magistrates can make appallingly shocking court judgements and never have to answer for their decision. But the blogger now has no right to the same.

In modern day Great Britain the right to express one’s opinions as one see’s fit – disclosed or undisclosed – has been killed by, of all things, a newspaper.

Quote from NightJack:

” I believe that as bloggers we are mostly short levers in a political world”

His blog might be gone but no doubt the book will follow.

Related Blog Posts: Hopi Sen – A Blog from the Backroom - he’s angry!

Iain Dale’s Diary – NightJack Blogger to be Unmasked

Journalism is Dead - As the print media competes with high profile bloggers, what do you think…?

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.

Toxic Efudix is NOT the answer to a wrinkle-free face

wrinklesI saw an article today that made my hair stand on end. Researchers have come out and claimed that cancer drug Efudix has anti-aging properties and can erase wrinkles. It is a cream that is placed over the site of a skin cancer and it contains chemotherapy drugs. The skin peels away over time revealing new skin underneath.

A very simple and clinical way to describe a very drastic treatment that has dreadful side effects and makes one incredibly ill at the same time. My mother had to use this for a BCC on her nose a few years back and she suffered terribly for the month she used it

It gives you raw, weeping hamburger flesh on your face that sloughs away – as well as flu-like symptoms and extreme nausea – the drug works to stimulate the immune system into healing the lesion, the cream itself does not do the healing. It was originally used to treat the herpes virus…still think it’s a good idea?

One lady found that it can even be lethal; she left a tube of it on a table among the bathroom safety products in her house and the dog decided to have a go at it. Next morning the dog was dead having ingested the cream.

Still like to try it…?

Give it a wide berth – even Australian doctors are hesitant to prescribe it nowadays. Better still, stay out of the sun – you’ll save the wrinkles and prevent skin cancer all at once. The ‘researchers’ must be out of their minds!

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.

Outrageous: Stephen Barker and Jason Owen appealing convictions and WE pay for it!

stephenbarker2I was at the gym this morning and flipping through a newspaper there when I saw an article that made me choke on my powerade – Stephen Barker and his brother Jason Owen are to appeal their recent convictions and their efforts will be financed by the British taxpayer.

That’s them to the left – as if nobody knows them by now…and to hell with those unfair reporting restrictions. We are footing their immoral actions, we are paying their legal team’s bills, so we have every right to know their names and what their ugly faces look like.

Barker has launched an attempt to overturn his convictions for the rape of Peter Connolly’s sister and the part he played in the little boy’s death. In a move that defies all logic and belief in what is loosely termed as British Justice his lawyers have now lodged papers appealing against both convictions and both sentences with the Court of Appeal. The same is being done on behalf of Barker’s brother Jason Owen, whose name was changed to try and protect the identity of the child-killing Stephen Barker.

The role that mother Tracey Connolly plays in this disgusting state of affairs highlights the vile individual that she is. She denied all the allegations against Barker, leaving no reasonable person in doubt that the evil trio systematically conspired to inflict as much pain and suffering on that little boy as possible until he died and then continued to do so in order to try to get out of paying for their repugnant crimes.

Now, courtesy of the British taxpayer, representatives of our supposedly ‘admired’ legal system are aiding and abhetting their efforts to escape justice. That little boy lies scattered as ashes – and we are paying British lawyers for them to be ground into the earth with the soles of their filthy shoes.

Makes you proud to be British eh folks…?

And now for the final insult…

There was some hope recently when, in response to the outcry over the lenient sentencing of Tracey Connolly, Stephen Barker and Jason Owen, the case was taken up by Attorney General Baroness Scotland.

She was to revise the ludicrous sentences passed down by Judge Stephen Kramer QC and explore the possibility of them being extended – proper time to match the crime. But we were all dreaming if we thought justice was going to be served in this case.

Baroness Scotland has decided that there is not going to be a revision of the sentences and the trio of murderers will not spend any extra time in prison for what they did to little Peter. In fact, as I said above, two of the monsters just might get out of it all together. She has stated that the sentences were “entirely merited”.

That this announcement comes from a public servant – as is the position of Attorney General – is bad enough, but one that is a woman just makes me sick. Or am I being incredibly naive there to assume a woman would look at this differently…

Yes I am. In her decision Baroness Scotland has effectively proclaimed that Peter’s suffering and murder was, in the end, ‘entirely merited’. In my opinion these three are only being imprisoned to protect them from public reprisals and not for what they did to that poor little boy. If anyone sitting in a position of power had any balls - the Baroness included – those three would never see the light of day again.

babypeterinjuries

Just a reminder about what was done to Peter Connolly…

It has to be asked, not for the first time and certainly not the last: Just how bad does it have to be for justice to be served that suits the crime. If a baby being tortured and killed is not ‘bad enough’ then god help children in this nation. A nation where the best interests of the criminal always comes first.

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.