Daily Archives: April 7, 2009

Sinn Fein MP’s: Not so anti-British when it comes to grabbing the perks

When is a Republican not a Republican…? when they are members of Sinn Fein being paid by the British taxpayer.

What hyprocrites. Gerry Adams, Martin McGuiness and Co have been exposed as claiming over £500,000 in expenses for the use of two London flats they share while at the same time refusing to sit and take their seats in the House of Commons. The flats are designed to provide a home/office for when the MP’s are sitting in Parliament and they are away from home.

Belfast is just an hour away from London by plane…

Yet these members of Sinn Fein openly boycott Parliament and at the same time hold their hands out for the cash. Once again I say – hyprocrites.

Yes Gerry, Martin and Co – that United Ireland nonsence can remain just good spin to those supporters back in Northern Ireland; you guys are doing too nicely being on the lucrative payroll of the British Govt. All those perks; the salaries, the pension packages…who will fund all that if your so-called United Ireland becomes reality?

I think Gerry and Martin know the answer to that question…

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.

‘If I had my life to live over’ – Erma Bombeck

One of the greatest writers whose works I had the  pleasure of reading was an American lady named Erma Bombeck. Erma’s books were about real life. She was a wife and mother of the 60′s and a journalist and bestselling author in the 70′s, 80′s and 90′s. She had one of the longest running columns in newspaper history. Erma wrote about life; about noisy kids, uncomfortable pregnancies, husbands who needed constant reminding to put the garbage out at night, tricky Christmas Day dinners with in-laws, those nightmare car trips with four kids and a dog…

Her books were funny, ironic, compassionate and I doubt there is one mother alive who could not identify with the everyday stuff she wrote about. Her books could also be heartbreakingly sad, but having turned the last page of one of her books you could not fail to have been moved or laughed till your sides almost split. Erma wrote about marriage and motherhood at a time when women all over the world were aiming for that glass ceiling – and in some cases forgetting what really mattered in life when ambition and being equal got in the way. Erma reminded us that women and men are as different as chalk and cheese – and that those differences should be celebrated.

She wrote about the small stuff- and it was the small stuff that makes up all our lives as we go about our everyday living. Erma once wrote in one of her books: “Don’t sweat the small stuff…” – meaning why waste time and energy fretting over the milk spilled on the rug when it will only get spilled again next week…

In the last book I read of Erma’s she told of a letter she received from a woman serving a life sentence in prison – the woman had lost the ability to cope and drowned her two young children in the bathtub. She wrote to Irma “If only I had been able to laugh at the same things you write about, maybe my children would be alive today…”

Erma died on April 22, 1996 having battled breast cancer and a lifelong kidney disorder. She was 69 years old. Just before she died she wrote this small piece about wisdom and hindsight – a very wise and wonderful woman herself, reminding us once again how ‘the small stuff’ can often mean the most…

If I had my life to live over.

I would have gone to bed when I was sick instead of pretending the earth would go into a holding pattern if I weren’t there for the day.

I would have burned the pink candle sculpted like a rose before it melted in storage.

I would have talked less and listened more.

I would have invited friends over to dinner even if the carpet was stained, or the sofa was faded.

I would have eaten the popcorn in the ‘good’ living room and worried much less about the dirt when someone wanted to light a fire in the fireplace.

I would have taken the time to listen to my grandfather ramble about his youth.

I would have shared more of the responsibilty carried by my husband.

I would never have insisted the car windows be rolled up on a summer day because my hair had been teased and sprayed.

I would have sat on the lawn with my children and not worried about grass stains.

I would have cried and laughed less while watching television – and more while watching life.

I would never have bought anything just because it was practical, wouldn’t show soil, or was guaranteed to last a lifetime.

Instead of wishing away nine months of pregnancy, I’d have cherished every moment and realised that the wonderment growing inside me was the only chance in life to assist God in a miracle.

When my kids kissed me impetuously, I would never have said, “Later…now go get washed up for dinner.”

There would have been more “I love you’s” and more “I’m sorry’s”.

But mostly, given another shot at life, I would seize every minute…look at it and really see it…live it…and never give it back.

My favourite Erma quote: “My theory on housework is, if the item doesn’t multiply, smell, catch on fire or block the refridgerator door, let it be. No one cares. Why should you?”.

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.

Are some children born ‘evil’? – yes, but not according to this Professor

In my work I have yet to encounter a child who was ‘evil’ – born bad. Rather, children behave badly because of what has been put into them and how they have been brought up. Violence is frequently the result of other violent acts.”

So claims Professor David Wilson of the Centre for Criminal Justice and Research at the University of Central England.

I say to the good Professor – think again.

While his words are correct in theory – treat a child like a punching bag and they will learn to do the same – in other ways he is seriously missing a big point; that ‘evil’ does exist and it does exist in some humans right from the start. Today an ‘evil’ adult is called a ‘psychopath’ – does Professor Wilson deny that such a condition begins in childhood…?

One school of thought explains that children grow to be cruel and calculating through their upbringing, through being maltreated and exposed to violence themselves. This explains many acts by young teenagers whose lives exist of domestic violence; young children who spend unending hours playing violent console games where the focus is on senseless slaughter with no consequences or penalty but point scoring and reward with each trigger pulled. This does obviously affect children and influence their behavour and attitude towards the concept of suffering, crime and punishment – this in my opinion is the new form of domestic violence. Violence, in the form of virtual reality, indulged on a daily basis -desensitizing children as young as three and four and certainly five, six and seven. These children that we see so often today grow into ‘sociopaths’.

But is there an ‘evil’ gene that is there from birth, or even conception, that requires nothing in the way of environmental influence to activate it…? is every baby born possessed of absolute innocence…?

Consider. You will always have kids who are cruel and bullying towards others; you will always have cruel and aggressive adults – cruelty and spite are inherent in many people and become normal behaviour for those who have been raised in such environments. That is all they know – it is the norm – however such behaviour is treatable in both adults and children with the appropriate therapy, they can feel remorse and understand why they behave as they do.

Then you have the true psychopath - unfeeling, calculating, totally lacking in remorse, impulsive, cunning, anti-social, callous…they cannot be cured only contained and controlled. No person can be ‘made’ to be a psychopath, or ‘evil’, this trait is there in the mind from the start. It is a seed which, when planted, grows steadily – the child psychopath, the ‘evil child’ will commit acts of shocking cruelty and feel no remorse whatsoever – unless identified as subnormal those actions will be simply be explained away as ‘naughty’, possibly ‘odd’ but often ignored – until the child grows into an adult and commits unspeakable crimes.

Novelist/psychiatrist Jonathan Kellerman explains: “Psychopathic isn’t ‘crazy’. It’s just unemotional, guilt-free, conscience-free and gratuitously violent…”

Kellerman insists that psychopaths, even child psychopaths, can tell the difference between right and wrong….”They do it because they love it – they do it because they can.”

Yes, children can be born ‘bad’, ‘evil’ – it is not their fault, it is as much an illness of the mind as is schitzophrenia – but true ‘evil’ in those who are can only be part of that person from the beginning. For people like Professor Wilson to deny this is wrong; it might have it’s own medical and scientific terms, but ‘evil’, unfortunately, can exist in children. It is one thing accepting this – it is another to know what to do with it.

Suggested Reading/Links:

‘Savage Spawn: Reflections on Violent Children’Jonathon Kellerman

Behavioural Traits of Psychopaths

Psychopathic Personality in Young People

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.