Monthly Archives: March 2009

Sentencing of Baby Peter’s killers – when…?

The intense public interest in the case of the abuse and murder of 17 month old Baby Peter is as strong now as it was when the shocking details first emerged in their entirety in November last year.

We have all been sickened and enraged at how this poor child was left to his terrible fate by Haringey Council social services – headed by Ed Balls and the appallingly arrogant Sharon Shoesmith.

We have read page after page of reports and descriptions; watched interviews with people who were concerned and tried to help and people who were supposed to be concerned but didn’t bother. We have listened to explanations and excuses by overly paid talking-heads and pen-pushers who are expert at filling out forms but totally clueless when stood in front of a bruised and battered baby boy with a broken back.

We have seen the repulsive faces of the three subhuman lifeforms who took pleasure in subjecting a baby to the misery of squalor, horrific torture and ultimately death – and were particularly sickened with the idea that the baby belonged to one of them.

We have seen the faces and know the names of those women – professional women – who ignored the sight of a cruelly tortured child in a stinking cesspit of a house and accepted the excuses of his fat, filthy mother.

We know every horrible, disgusting detail of the case of how this poor child was abused, neglected, tortured and finally beaten to death. We know how he was allowed to suffer and ultimately die in a blood spattered cot in a room littered with rubbish and dog shit.

We know who the three people responsible are.

What we want to know now is when these three are going to receive their sentences; first it was December 2008 – then it was January 2009 – and finally sentencing was set for March. Well, March has almost been and gone and we, the public, are waiting to see what is going to happen with these three.

Update 01/05/09: Trial finished

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.

Scottish Pretender meddles with the monarchy…

It is not the first time a ‘Pretender’ in the form of a Scot has caused trouble for the British. Prime Minister, Gordon ‘McBroon’ Brown, whose Nu Labour has done more damage to the British way of life than any other government in British history is now steering his wrecking ball towards that most endurable of everything British – it’s monarchy.

Not content with doing it’s best to drive Christianity into the English soil; not content with discouraging the solid family unit and instead encouraging a non-working, welfare-bludging underclass fit only to breed a generation of uneducated, unfeeling feral kids; not content with giving the people a leftist regime hell bent on undermining basic values and morals…

This uninvited, unelected ‘leader’ has effectively worked to destroy every tradition and every institution that put the ‘Great’ into Britain. His leadership, along with Tony Blair’s, has resulted in a Britain that has become an anti-Christian, politically correct Euroepan state where the only welcoming arms open are to dubious asylum seekers and illegal immigrants.

And now he wants to meddle with the monarchy. He wants to abolish Salic Law (whereby the eldest male has precedence over a female sibling in line to the throne). Fine in some ways, as it is outdated, but totally useless for at least two generations to come…and who really cares anyway?

He also wants the 1704 Act of Settlement interfered with so that an heir to the throne may marry a Roman Catholic without having to renounce his right of succession – as is currently the case. Okay, so it has discriminatory overtones, but once again…who cares? unless Will’s or Harry each have a good Catholic girl lined up somewhere what is the point? I do not see either of these guys marrying for a long time yet.

Someone tell this Scot to leave well alone – there are only some things the people will tolerate. Taking his place in history as the worst Prime Minister (along with Blair) in British history is one thing; standing as the Scotsman who invited the Vatican back into Palace politics is quite another!

Henry VIII would know what to do…

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.

13 year old Alfie Patten is NOT the daddy of Maisie

alfiepattenA British Magistrate placed a ban on the media publicising further details about this very sad case however it has been revealed that DNA tests have been completed and results have concluded that 13 year old Alfie Patten is NOT the father of baby Maisie. To be honest when I first saw this child – and remember, he is a child – I found it very difficult to believe he could even spell the word ‘sperm’ let alone produce them. And as for Chantelle, the 15 year old mother…hardly the naive and innocent type despite her age.

Which leaves you wondering who on earth is the father of this unfortunate baby?

I knew there was going to be trouble about all this when a series of teenage boys (and they ARE boys) began lining up claiming possible paternity as soon as Maisie was born. The whole thing is not only sad in it’s indictment on a certain section of UK society today but also infuriating that Chantelle’s family almost managed to rake in a lot of money over the publicity surrounding this.

Personally, even if the father is identified, I say take the baby and place her with a couple who have values, morals and a future. She needs to grow up the loved daughter of two parents, not as the subject of a sideshow run by freaks.

Source: Daily Telegraph, Australia.

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.