Daily Archives: January 6, 2009

The Diary of Anne Frank – the BBC series does not measure up

Out of all the books I have ever read ‘The Diary of Anne Frank’ is one which stands out as one of the few which touched me right to the soul. Since I was a young girl I have re-read that book, and many others about her and her family, to the point where I would not consider myself so much an expert but I feel familiar with Anne’s spirit and how she was as a person. How her family were as people, both together and as individuals.

So I eagerly awaited the new BBC serialisation of the book and watched the first episode last night.

So far I am quite disappointed.

Anne was, by her own description, like “quicksilver”. She was hyperactive, chatty, cheeky…spirited. I don’t know why but Ellie Kendrick’s Anne is so laid back she could be on valium. Her whole characterisation seems to be focused on Anne’s well known talent for answering back to her elders; she gives us a plummy-voiced Anne delivering her lines as if trying to win an elocution competition. Where’s the spark, where’s the girl…?

Anne was just 13 when she entered the annexe and a very slight, tiny 13 at that. Ellie Kendrick looks older (she was 17 during filming) and acts far too sophisticated and worldly – which was something Anne was not. Maturity and a sense of naive ‘sophistication’ were qualities that would come to Anne toward the end of her time in hiding.

Otto Frank was no doubt the leader of the group in the annexe but so far Iain Glen does not convince me that he is quite the dignified and wise Papa that Anne so adored. As Margot, Felicity Jones captures her character in such a way that if she had no lines to speak you wouldn’t know she was there – she was also much taller than Anne at the beginning of their time in the annexe.

Maybe it would have been asking for too much but some accents would have added to the quality and credibility…but only if done properly. I have always thought that Meryl Streep would be an ideal Edith Frank – with the right makeup, wardrobing and Meryl’s brilliant talent for foreign dialect she would bring Annes misunderstood and tragic mother to life beautifully.

The production is just too….english. These actors are portraying German Jews who had particular mannerisms and traits – none are evident in these characters – close your eyes and you could be listening to an english drama on the radio.

Okay, so it is only episode one I am referring to; I shall persevere during the rest of the series if only for the fact that it was filmed in the actual Prinsengracht annexe itself. I have been there and was struck by the atmosphere and how frustrating it must have been for those people to have existed in that small space for over two years.

But you dont have to go there – just pick up a copy of Anne’s book and you can experience it all yourself through the amazing talent of a little girl who would undoubtedly have gone on to do greater things had she been allowed to live. She would have turned 80 years old on June 12th this year…

But of all the wondeful things she might have done – this definitely would have been the greatest.

Anne Franks diary.

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.

Sharon Shoesmith and her sheer arrogance

In a move reeking of total arrogance former head of childrens services at Haringey Council, Sharon Shoesmith, is to appeal her dismissal and aims to seek compensation in the form of a six figure sum.

Now, this woman was not dismissed from her post because of taking too many sickies, or for getting her hands caught in the tillshe was dismissed due to the enormous public outcry over her appalling handling of the case which saw baby Peter tortured and murdered at the hands of his mother, , her boyfriend and his brother Jason Owen.

This woman led a team of total incompetants who actively encouraged the decision to leave the poor child in that house of horrors and who also bent over backwards to defame, discourage and even threaten the one social worker who tried to save the baby’s life - Nevres Kemal.

Her team made sixty visits to see  Peter somehow ‘missed’ the very obvious signs of abuse all over his little body and then passed the buck when he was killed. Heading that team, she and her fellow council workers waged a campaign of bullying tactics against Ms Kemal to the point of theatening to take Ms Kemals own daughter away from her should she continue in her attempts to have Peters case be given higher priority.

Sharon Shoesmith’s team even fought for the mother’s ‘right’ to retain custody of the little baby girl  she gave birth to while in prison after Peter’s death.

And now she wants her job back and she wants a lottery-sized payout for all the inconvenience she has suffered. She thinks she is entitled to money out of the already woefully underfunded coffers that exist to provide care for at-risk children.

The sheer arrogance of this woman is unbelievable.

I hope that when her case is heard that those in charge of making the decision show the same indifference to her plea and lack of consideration for her future that she, Sharon Shoesmith, displayed towards little  Peter  as he suffered and died in the house that Sharon Shoesmith saw fit to leave him in.

She deserves nothing more.

Copyright © 2007-2012 Cultured Views. All rights reserved.